Lived experience is qualitatively different from that of an imagined statement. Three components are included in this technique: structured interview with the victim. Criteria-based content analysis (cbca) that evaluates the content of the statement. Integration of the cbca with a series of questions called the validity list. The main element is the cbca. This analysis is performed according to a list of 19 criteria: general characteristics: logical structure. Unstructured elaboration.
Amount of details specific contents: contextual gear. Description of interactions. Playback of conversations. Unexpected complications. Peculiarities of the content unusual details. Superfluous details. Misunderstanding of accurately reported details. Related whatsapp number list external associations. Allusions to the subjective mental state. Attributions to the mental state of the perpetrator of the crime. Content related to motivation spontaneous fixes. Admission of lack of memory. Raise doubts about the testimony itself. Self-deprecation. Forgive the perpetrator of the crime.
Specific elements of the offense characteristic details of the offense. Evaluation of the credibility of the testimony in gender violence in spain we can find various methods of psychological expertise in gender violence. Within these we find techniques based on the structure proposed by the sva. One of the most widely used in spain is the global evaluation system (seg) , designed by arce and fariña . This system is used to assess the credibility of testimony in both adults and children. To specifically assess the testimonies of victims of gender violence, these authors propose a specific protocol made up of ten stages: obtaining the declaration.